| Authors |
Chen, Lurie |
| Journal |
Journal of Marketing Research |
| Year |
2013 |
| Type |
Published Paper |
| Abstract |
Prior research shows that positive online reviews are less valued than negative reviews. The authors argue that this is due to differences in causal attributions for positive versus negative information such that positive reviews tend to be relatively more attributed to the reviewer (vs. product experience) than negative reviews. The presence of temporal contiguity cues, which indicate that review writing closely follows consumption, reduces the relative extent to which positive reviews are attributed to the reviewer and mitigates the negativity bias. An examination of 65,531 Yelp.com restaurant reviews shows that review value is negatively related to review valence but that this negative relationship is absent for reviews that contain temporal contiguity cues. A series of lab studies replicates these findings and suggests that temporal contiguity cues enhance the value of a positive review and increase the likelihood of choosing a product with a positive review by changing reader beliefs about the cause of the review. |
| Keywords |
Word of mouth, negativity bias, temporal contiguity, causal attributions |
| URL |
https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.12.0063 |
| Tags |
Archival Empirical |
Consumer Decisions |
Experimental / Survey-Based Empirical |
Social Transmission Biases
|